MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410016387 · doi:10.17236/sat00454

Possible side effects of hormonal castration in a dog

2025· article· de· W4410016387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louis J. Kost, Katharina Rohner

Bibliographic record

VenueSchweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastrationHormoneMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: A young, healthy male Labrador developed regurgitation, diarrhea, and decreased general condition after hormonal castration using a deslorelin implant (Suprelorin®) and concurrent cyproterone acetate injection. The gastrointestinal symptoms improved with symptomatic treatment, but lethargy persisted. The cause of the initial gastrointestinal symptoms is suspected to be impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by the injected cyproterone acetate. Cyproterone acetate has a known glucocorticoid effect and inhibits the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis like other progestogens. Low-dose (0,1 mg/kg once daily) and high-dose (1 mg/kg once daily) prednisolone therapy led to a slight improvement in the general condition. Seven weeks after the cyproterone acetate injection, the dog was noticeably more active, but only after the surgical removal of the deslorelin implant did the owner considered the dog «back to his old self.« This suggests that the dog's reduced general condition was a side effect of the hormonal neutering. Twenty-one weeks after the deslorelin implant application and cyproterone acetate injection, and fourteen weeks after the last prednisolone administration, the adrenal glands responded normally in the ACTH stimulation test. One year later, the owner describes the dog as healthy without any gastrointestinal symptoms since then.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchweizer Archiv für TierheilkundeSame topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207