Source reconstruction without an MRI using optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Source modelling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) infers the spatial origins of electrophysiological signals in the brain. Typically, this requires an anatomical MRI scan of the subject's head, from which models of the magnetic fields generated by the brain (the forward model) are derived. Wearable MEG-based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs)-enables MEG measurement from participants who struggle to cope with conventional scanning environments (e.g., children), enabling study of novel cohorts. However, its value is limited if an MRI scan is still required for source modelling. Here we describe a method of warping template MRIs to 3D structured-light scans of the head, to generate "pseudo-MRIs". We apply our method to data from 20 participants during a sensory task, measuring induced (beta band) responses and whole-brain functional connectivity. Results show that the group average locations of peak task-induced beta modulation were separated by 2.75 mm, when comparing real- and pseudo-MRI approaches. Group averaged time-frequency spectra were also highly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.99) as were functional connectome matrices (0.87) and global connectivity (0.98). In sum, our results demonstrate that source-localised OPM-MEG data, modelled with and without an individual MRI scan, can be comparable. While individual MRI scans remain the "gold standard" for OPM-MEG modelling, our method will be useful for future studies where MRI data capture is challenging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".