MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410024890 · doi:10.55016/pbgrc.v1i1.81399

A Call to Action for Leveraging Cultural Capital and Funds of Knowledge in Academic Integration of South Asian International Students in STEM Programs at Canadian Universities

2025· article· en· W4410024890 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Rahul

Bibliographic record

VenuePeer Beyond Graduate Research Conference · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCall to actionAction (physics)Capital (architecture)BusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsMarketingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internationalization of post-secondary STEM education enriches global knowledge exchange yet causes cultural, linguistic, and psychological challenges for South Asian international students. This discussion underscores the importance of implementing academic initiatives that recognize diverse cultural backgrounds and funds of knowledge. Incorporating asset-based strategies fosters inclusive participation, a sense of belonging, and better academic integration. Collaborative and systemic approaches can transform Canadian STEM programs into more equitable, innovative and engaging learning communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.283
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeer Beyond Graduate Research ConferenceSame topicInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesFrench-language works237,207