MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410027330 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322178

Exploratory outcomes of the DHA WIN randomized controlled trial: Supplementing women with docosahexaenoic acid did not reduce the impact of neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy on quality of life or exercise behaviour

2025· article· en· W4410027330 on OpenAlexafffund
Marnie Newell, Susan Goruk, Kerry S. Courneya, Sunita Ghosh, Anil A. Joy, Jaqueline Munhoz, Catherine J. Field

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineDocosahexaenoic acidBreast cancerChemotherapyRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineAerobic exerciseCancerPhysical therapyOncologyPolyunsaturated fatty acidFatty acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementation of omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids has been associated with reduced side effects and improved quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The current study reports secondary outcomes from the DHA WIN randomized controlled trial which was designed to evaluate docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation (4.4 g/day) in conjunction with six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (3 weeks/cycle) in women with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 49). The objective of the current study was to assess the effects of DHA supplementation on QoL and exercise behaviour in women undergoing NAC for breast cancer. Self-administered questionnaires were used to measure QoL and exercise behaviour before starting chemotherapy (baseline), before each chemotherapy cycle (exercise), and after completing chemotherapy. DHA supplementation did not significantly affect QoL, aerobic exercise volume or resistance training frequency during treatment. However, mean aerobic exercise volume was significantly lower at week 12 (-53.5 minutes/week; 95% CI, -100.5 to -6.3; p = 0.02) and week 18 (-70.8 minutes/week; 95% CI, -123.0 to -18.6; p = 0.01) compared to baseline. Mean resistance training frequency was lower at week 12 (-0.57 times/week; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.13; p = 0.02) compared to baseline. Meeting exercise guidelines during chemotherapy was not associated with better QoL. In the current exploratory study, QoL and exercise decreased during treatment regardless of DHA supplementation, highlighting the need for supportive care and potential therapies that may mitigate these declines in breast cancer patients receiving NAC. Adequately powered studies are needed to determine if DHA supplementation improves these two indices of health. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03831178).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→