MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410028061 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.30.25326720

Ferritin and transferrin predict common carotid intima-media thickness in females: a machine-learning informed individual participant data meta-analysis

2025· preprint· en· W4410028061 on OpenAlexaff
R. Anand, Richard Sparla, Janice L. Atkins, Claudia Altamura, Todd J. Anderson, Ebru Aşıcıoğlu, Judit Bassols, Abel López‐Bermejo, Hana Marie Dvořáková, José Manuel Fernández‐Real, Christoph Hochmayr, Michael Knoflach, Jovana Kušić, Silvia Lai, José María Moreno‐Navarrete, Dariusz Pawlak, Krystyna Pawlak, Petr Syrovátka, Dorota Formanowicz, Pavel Kraml, José Manuel Valdivielso, Luca Valenti, Martina U. Muckenthaler

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerritinMeta-analysisIntima-media thicknessInternal medicineMedicineArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePsychologyCarotid arteries

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Iron overload promotes atherosclerosis in mice and causes vascular dysfunction in humans with Hemochromatosis. However, data are controversial on whether systemic iron availability within physiological limits affects the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. We, therefore, performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis and studied the association between serum iron biomarkers with common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT); in addition, since sex influences iron metabolism and vascular diseases, we studied if there are sex-specific differences. METHODS: We pooled the IPD and analysed the data on adults (age≥18y) by orthogonal approaches: machine learning (ML) and a single-stage meta-analysis. For ML, we tuned a gradient-boosted tree regression model (XGBoost) and subsequently, we interpreted the features using variable importance. For the single-stage metaanalysis, we examined the association between iron biomarkers and CC-IMT using spline-based linear mixed models, accounting for sex interactions and study-specific effects. To confirm robustness, we repeated analyses on imputed data using multivariable regression adjusted for key covariates identified through machine learning. Further, subgroup analyses were performed in children and adolescents (age<18y). In addition, to evaluate causality, we used UK Biobank data to examine associations between the hemochromatosis (HFE) genotypes (C282Y/H63D) and mean CC-IMT in ~ 42,500 participants with carotid ultrasound data, using sex-stratified linear regression (adjusted for age, assessment centre, and genetic principal components). RESULTS: We included IPD from 21 studies (N = 10,807). The application of the ML model showed moderate predictive performance and identified iron biomarkers (transferrin, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and iron) as key features for IMT prediction. Multivariable analyses showed non-linear sex-specific relationships for ferritin and transferrin with CC-IMT, both only among females at specific ranges. Ferritin showed a significant positive association [Ferritin > 233 ng/mL: β = 0.04, 95% CI (0.002, 0.08), p = 0.037], while transferrin showed negative associations at specific ranges [ Transferrrin 231–263 mg/dL: β=-0.21, 95% CI (-0.43, 0.003), p = 0.054; Transferrrin > 263 mg/dL: β=-0.73, 95% CI (-1.48, 0.01), p = 0.05]; No significant associations were found between CC-IMT in those with HFE genotypes in either sex in the UK Biobank. CONCLUSION: Our observational data show that iron biomarkers - ferritin and transferrin are non-linearly associated with CC-IMT specifically in females, while a significant causal association between the HFE genotype and CC-IMT could not be demonstrated in the UK Biobank data. We conclude that our observational findings may reflect residual confounding, reverse causation, or other non-causal mechanisms rather than a direct causal relationship. OTHER: No financial support was received for this meta-analysis. The protocol for this study is registered in the PROSPERO database ( CRD42020155429; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.031
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207