MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410028413 · doi:10.22329/csw.v25i1.8934

Remembering Amy Rossiter: Introduction

2024· article· en· W4410028413 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Anne O’Connell, Yuk‐Lin Renita Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Social Work · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This issue of Critical Social Work is devoted to recognizing and celebrating Professor Amy Rossiter, her critical scholarship, and its widespread influence across Canada and internationally. A revered social work theoretician, teacher, colleague and friend, Amy passed away on January 17, 2023. Amy left us too soon and we mourn her loss. She continues to enrich our lives with her timeless, incisive, and brilliant scholarship. Amy completed a Bachelor of Music, an MSW, and PhD from the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto, in 1986. She joined the School of Social Work, at York University, as Associate Professor in 1992, acting as Director of the School from 1999-2002, and retiring in 2014. Amy shaped all aspects of our undergraduate and graduate programs. She developed and taught our foundational communication course, advanced practice, and our doctoral course on Social Justice. A devoted musician, her longtime membership in the Mendelssohn Choir afforded us opportunities to watch her perform outside of the classroom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Social WorkSame topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207