MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410031223 · doi:10.5206/mirror.v45i1.21261

Lines in the Sand

2025· article· en· W4410031223 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alexandre Hinton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mirror - Undergraduate History Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay examines the pivotal role of the Rainbow Beach wade-ins in challenging Chicago’s segregated swimming areas during the civil rights movement. Led by young activists, including NAACP Youth Council leader Velma Murphy Hill, these protests faced violent resistance but highlighted the city’s entrenched racism. The essay explores Chicago’s history of racial violence at beaches, beginning with the 1919 race riot, and argues that the wade-ins were instrumental in accelerating white flight and reshaping segregation tactics. Finally, it analyzes how de facto segregation at Chicago’s beaches continues today through policies like permitting, beach badges, and environmental barriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mirror - Undergraduate History JournalSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207