“Rooted in ableism:” an embedded mixed methods study of disability disclosure on a university campus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disabled higher education students are more likely to experience academic failure and lower rates of graduation. Disability disclosure is often required to receive supports associated with academic success. Disabled students at a large urban university in the United States (U.S.) responded to an online mixed methods needs assessment survey. Participants more likely to disclose disability were older, had received K-12 special education services, had needs not exclusive to mental health, had difficulty with a sense of belonging on campus and endorsed peer support as helpful to them. Qualitative analysis indicated disabled students considered self-advocacy and empowerment, needed supports, and anticipated stigma experiences when faced with disability disclosure decisions. Recommendations are made regarding campus culture, accessibility to supports and promoting overall higher education functioning for disabled students on a U.S. university campus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it