Detecting Cr<sup>6+</sup> at ≈100 pM Concentration with Fluorescence Enhancement Signatures in a Novel Eco‐Fluorophore: Matching WHO's 96 pM Recommended Standard for Drinking Water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hexavalent chromium (Cr 6+ ) ions in drinking water pose a significant risk to human health, being a leading cause for neurological disorders, organ damage, and infertility. This study introduces an ultrasensitive method for detecting trace Cr 6+ over a wide concentration range (≈ 100 pM – 100 µM) through fluorescence enhancement signatures via integration of both covalent and non‐covalent interaction strategies on carbon quantum dots (CQD). The covalent functionalization is achieved from dual‐functionalized CQD (CQD‐(NH 2 , COOH)) derived from coffee‐waste. Additionally, the covalent and non‐covalent approach integrates CQD‐(NH 2 , COOH) with graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4 ) to form a 2D/2D heterostructure. The synergy between CQD‐(NH 2 , COOH) and g‐C 3 N 4 introduces a mid‐gap band in their band structure, allowing multiple carrier excitation and recombination states, significantly enhancing the fluorescence quenching signal. This combination allows to achieve Cr 6+ detection sensitivity down to ≈100 pM concentration—matching the World Health Organization's 96 pM permissible limit of total Cr in drinking water. Furthermore, a 70 pM detection limit is reported for Cr 6+ in a mixture of twelve ions, including cations and anions, surpassing current state‐of‐the‐art detection limits. These results highlight the potential of dual covalent and non‐covalent modification strategy in nanomaterials to set new standards in ultrasensitive and wide‐range fluorescent sensing applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".