MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410037052 · doi:10.1002/nbm.70055

In Vivo Quantification of Creatine Kinase Kinetics in Mouse Brain Using <sup>31</sup>P‐MRS at 7 T

2025· article· en· W4410037052 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Tachrount, Sean Smart, Jason P. Lerch, Antoine Cherix

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersWellcome TrustSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIn vivoRepeatabilityCreatine kinaseRespirationCreatineBiologyChemistryNeuroscienceBiochemistryGeneticsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT 31P‐MRS is a method of choice for studying neuroenergetics in vivo, but its application in the mouse brain has been limited, often restricted to ultrahigh field (> 7 T) MRI scanners. Establishing its feasibility on more readily available preclinical 7‐T scanners would create new opportunities to study metabolism and physiology in murine models of brain disorders. Here, we demonstrate that the apparent forward rate constant (kf) of creatine kinase (CK) can be accurately quantified using a progressive saturation‐transfer approach in the mouse brain at 7 T. We also find that a 20% reduction in respiration of anesthetized mice can lead to 36% increase in kf attributable to a drop in cellular pH and mitochondrial ATP production. To achieve this, we used a test–retest analysis to assess the reliability and repeatability of 31P‐MRS acquisition, analysis, and experimental design protocols. We report that many 31P‐containing metabolites can be reliably measured using a localized 3D‐ISIS sequence, which showed highest SNR amplitude, SNR consistency, and minimal T2 relaxation signal loss. Our study identifies key physiological factors influencing mouse brain energy homeostasis in vivo and provides a methodological basis to guide future studies interested in implementing 31P‐MRS on preclinical 7‐T scanners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNMR in BiomedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207