Impact of through‐slice gradient optimization for dynamic slice‐wise shimming in the cervico‐thoracic spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose This study investigates the effectiveness of through‐slice gradient optimization in dynamic slice‐wise B0 shimming of the cervico‐thoracic spinal cord to enhance signal recovery in gradient‐echo (GRE) EPI sequences commonly used in functional MRI studies. Methods Six volunteers underwent MRI acquisitions with dynamic shim updating (DSU) using a custom‐built 15‐channel AC/DC coil at 3 T. A magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient echo was acquired to segment the spine and to provide a clear image of the anatomical region of interest in the figures. GRE B0 field maps were used to measure field homogeneity before and after shimming; the pre‐shimming field map was used for optimization. Shimmed fields were dynamically applied to GRE–echo planar imaging acquisitions simulating functional MRI acquisitions under two shimming conditions: DSU with and without through‐slice gradient consideration. Results DSU with through‐slice gradient optimization increased the temporal signal‐to‐noise ratio at the T2 vertebral level by 201% compared with volume‐wise shim and by 28% compared with DSU without through‐slice. The residual geometric distortions were similar between DSU with and without through‐slice gradient optimization. A high signal loss penalty parameter was effective in simulations for reducing through‐slice gradient‐induced signal loss but led to instability and reduced image quality in actual acquisitions due to excessive in‐plane B0 inhomogeneities. Conclusion Introducing a carefully balanced through‐slice gradient parameter in slice‐wise shimming substantially improves signal recovery in axial GRE images of the spinal cord, without compromising in‐plane homogeneity. This effective approach can advance spinal cord functional MRI applications at high field strengths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".