MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410039797 · doi:10.1177/09683445251338543

Contention on the Cotentin: Military-Medical Entrepreneurs and the French Contractor State During the Seven Years’ War

2025· article· en· W4410039797 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamen N. Goff

Bibliographic record

VenueWar in History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSociety for French Historical StudiesFlorida State University
KeywordsState (computer science)HistoryForensic engineeringAncient historyMedical emergencyEngineeringMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an unstudied facet of the French contractor state, focusing on the relationship between medical entrepreneurs and the war ministry. Observing three reserve hospitals built in Normandy during the Seven Years’ War, it argues that the state could not accurately estimate demand for medical facilities in wartime. This uncertainty put entrepreneurs in a difficult situation where they could not simultaneously carry out their duties and turn an immediate profit. Contractors therefore attempted to improve their chances of long term gain by producing memoirs, soliciting attestations, and leaning on well-placed contacts to build up personal credit. This credit in hand, contractors could more easily secure indemnities disbursed by the government once a conflict had ended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.023
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWar in HistorySame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207