MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410040864 · doi:10.3389/frfst.2025.1581877

Incorporation of fruits or fruit pulp into yoghurts: recent developments, challenges, and opportunities

2025· article· en· W4410040864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Food Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulp (tooth)Food scienceHorticulturePulp and paper industryChemistryBusinessEngineeringBiologyMedicineDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incorporation of fruits and/or fruit pulps into fermented dairy products has gained substantial interest in the food industry, driven by consumer demand for functional foods that combine health benefits with natural ingredients. This value addition enhances plain yoghurts with antioxidants, dietary fiber, bioactive compounds, and probiotics, delivering potential health benefits such as immune modulation, gut health improvement, and reduced risks of metabolic disorders. Fruit components interact with the macromolecular structure of yoghurt, influencing its physicochemical properties, texture, and sensory attributes. Organic acids modulate protein gelation and emulsification, polyphenols alter protein aggregation and antioxidant stability, and dietary fibers enhance water-holding capacity and probiotic viability. These interactions significantly impact yoghurt’s structure, stability, and functional benefits, necessitating an understanding of their mechanisms. Fruits such as pomegranate, passion fruit, and açaí pulp have demonstrated antioxidative and cardioprotective properties, while innovations in incorporating fruit peels and seeds, such as passion fruit peel flour and grape skin, enhance physicochemical stability and nutrient density. Beyond these advantages, challenges such as increased syneresis, altered pH, reduced probiotic viability, and microbial contamination during storage persist. This review critically evaluates the impact of fruit incorporation into yoghurt, examining its effects on probiotic viability, physicochemical properties, sensory attributes, and microbiological stability. Achieving an optimal balance requires careful selection of fruit sources, processing strategies, and formulation techniques to sustain probiotic viability and yoghurt stability throughout its shelf life. By synthesizing recent research, this review highlights both the challenges and opportunities in developing fruit-enriched yoghurts, emphasizing strategies to optimize processing techniques and preserve key quality attributes. The findings offer a scientific framework for developing innovative, health-promoting, and shelf-stable fruit-enriched yoghurts, aligning with evolving market demands and functional food advancements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it