MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410042395 · doi:10.1080/15388220.2025.2491807

Exploring the Prospective Relationship Between School Safety Climate and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms: A Multilevel Approach

2025· article· en· W4410042395 on OpenAlexaff
Gabrielle Yale‐Soulière, Frédéric N. Brière, Élizabeth Olivier, Kim Archambault, Isabelle Archambault, Michel Janosz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of School Violence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilevel modelPsychologyPoison controlOccupational safety and healthHuman factors and ergonomicsSuicide preventionInjury preventionDepressive symptomsClinical psychologyApplied psychologyEnvironmental healthMedicineAnxietyPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines if the school safety climate is associated with depressive symptoms in students, beyond direct violence exposure. 5,262 students from 71 secondary schools were followed annually. We assessed safety climate using the Socio-educational environment questionnaire and derived school-level (Level 2; average of student scores) and student-level (Level 1; group mean-centered scores) safety measures, and depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that individual perceptions of safety strongly correlate with depressive symptoms, especially among girls, while no significant link was found at the school level. This study shows that personal perceptions of safety are better predictors of depressive symptoms than the general safety climate of schools, emphasizing the importance of further research to explore how insecurity affects students differently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of School ViolenceSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207