MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410048709 · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-3861i

Real-Time UX Behavior Analytics using Flask, Javascript Event Listeners, and Heatmap Rendering for Interface Refinement

2022· article· en· W4410048709 on OpenAlexaff
Dheerendra Yaganti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJavaScriptComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)AnalyticsEvent (particle physics)Human–computer interactionComputer graphics (images)DatabaseProgramming languagePhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancing user experience (UX) is a critical aspect of modern web application development. This paper proposes a real-time UX behavior analytics framework that leverages Python Flask for backend orchestration, JavaScript-based event listeners for interaction tracking, and heatmap libraries for intuitive visualization. The system captures granular user activity data, including mouse movements, clicks, scroll depth, and session duration, directly from the client-side environment. These events are transmitted asynchronously to a Flask-based RESTful API, where the data is processed, stored, and aggregated for analysis. To facilitate actionable insights, the framework incorporates heatmap rendering engines that visually map user interactions across the interface. This visualization aids in identifying user attention zones, interaction bottlenecks, and underutilized UI elements. The paper also presents post-session analytics capabilities, allowing designers to analyze engagement trends over time. Security and performance optimizations, including data anonymization and batch processing, ensure scalability without compromising responsiveness. Through a series of controlled deployments and iterative interface adjustments, the framework demonstrates measurable improvements in user engagement and navigation efficiency. This research contributes a modular, low-latency architecture that supports continuous UX refinement through real-time behavior analytics, offering developers a practical tool for data-driven interface optimization in modern web environments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and TechnologySame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207