Exaggeration Through Sexual Selection May Impact the Thermal Biology of Arthropods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sexual selection is often invoked to explain the evolution of extravagant morphologies, such as antlers and horns. While the focus is typically on the process of exaggeration of these traits, the functional impact of exaggeration remains a topic of debate. One aspect that has been largely overlooked is how exaggerated structures might impact thermal biology. For example, as a hollow (i.e., non-vascularized or non-perfused) structure increases in size, its surface area and volume change, potentially impacting its ability to obtain and dissipate heat passively. However, if the exaggerated structure is vascularized, or in the case of arthropods, has hemolymph perfusion, then it may be actively used as a thermal radiator to avoid overheating in instances of thermal stress. Based on these and additional examples, we propose that morphological exaggeration may influence how arthropods manage heat exchange with the environment. Ultimately, individuals that bear exaggerated structures may develop ecological innovations that, due to selection or as a corollary effect, maximize effectiveness of thermoregulation. Our essay is divided into four sections. First, we delve on how exaggerated structures, particularly animal weapons, may impact how organisms exchange heat with the environment, and the implications for whole-organism thermoregulation. Second, we use beetles and fiddler crabs to provide experimental evidence of how structural exaggeration may influence thermal biology. Third, we examine macroecological data from arthropods to explore how the size of sexually selected morphologies varies with changes in environmental temperature. Finally, we synthesize these pieces of evidence to identify significant ecological implications and gaps in knowledge. Through this essay, we aim to ignite discussion on how morphological changes driven by sexual selection can lead to innovations not only in the functional role of morphologies but also in the thermal biology of individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".