MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410051951 · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01652-9

Multimodal GPT model for assisting thyroid nodule diagnosis and management

2025· article· en· W4410051951 on OpenAlexaff
Jincao Yao, Yunpeng Wang, Zhikai Lei, Kai Wang, Na Feng, Fajin Dong, Jianhua Zhou, Xiaoxian Li, Xiang Hao, Jiafei Shen, Shanshan Zhao, Yuan Gao, Vicky Yang Wang, Di Ou, Xing Li, Yidan Lu, Li‐Yu Chen, Yang Chen, Liping Wang, Bojian Feng, Yahan Zhou, Chen Chen, Yuqi Yan, Zhengping Wang, Rongrong Ru, Yaqing Chen, Yanming Zhang, Ping Liang, Dong Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Digital Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNodule (geology)ThyroidThyroid nodulesMedicineRadiologyMedical physicsComputer sciencePathologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze ultrasound images is a promising approach to assessing thyroid nodule risks, traditional AI models lack transparency and interpretability. We developed a multimodal generative pre-trained transformer for thyroid nodules (ThyGPT), aiming to provide a transparent and interpretable AI copilot model for thyroid nodule risk assessment and management. Ultrasound data from 59,406 patients across nine hospitals were retrospectively collected to train and test the model. After training, ThyGPT was found to assist in reducing biopsy rates by more than 40% without increasing missed diagnoses. In addition, it detects errors in ultrasound reports 1,610 times faster than humans. With the assistance of ThyGPT, the area under the curve for radiologists in assessing thyroid nodule risks improved from 0.805 to 0.908 (p < 0.001). As an AI-generated content-enhanced computer-aided diagnosis (AIGC-CAD) model, ThyGPT has the potential to revolutionize how radiologists use such tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Digital MedicineSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207