Genetic analysis of three patients from two unrelated Chinese families with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a rare early-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, spasticity, and sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. This disorder is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the sacsin (SACS) gene on chromosome 13q12.12. Three patients with ARSACS from two unrelated Chinese families were recruited for this study. Patient #1 was an 18-year-old male who had been walking unstably for 12 years. Patient #2, the younger sister of Patient #1, was a 5-year-old girl who had been walking unstably for 2 years. Patient #3 was a 19-year-old female who had been walking unstably and a tendency to fall for 17 years. For Patient #1, whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified a hemizygous variant c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in SACS (NM_014363.6), with the father being heterozygous, the mother wild-type, and Patient #2 hemizygous, as verified by Sanger sequencing. Additional copy number variant analysis of the WES data indicated that Patient #1 had a heterozygous gross deletion of chr13q12.12 (chr13:23,808,732 - 24,890,322). Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing results revealed that Patient #2 carried a chr13q12.12 deletion (chr13:23,520,000-24,940,000). Together with Sanger sequencing results, this gross deletion was speculated to have been inherited from the mother, further explaining the hemizygous state of c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in Patients #1 and #2. Through WES, Patient #3 was identified as having suspected compound heterozygous variants of c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*), inherited from the father and mother, respectively, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing. This study identified three variants in SACS. The c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) is novel, whereas c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*) have been reported previously. Moreover, this study highlights the growing trend that ARSACS has become increasingly prevalent worldwide rather than being localized to a specific region or race. As an increasing number of patients with ARSACS are diagnosed, the genetic spectrum of ARSACS will gradually broaden, providing an accurate genetic basis for prenatal diagnosis of mothers in the years ahead, if possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".