MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410057404 · doi:10.1186/s12920-025-02151-2

Genetic analysis of three patients from two unrelated Chinese families with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay

2025· article· en· W4410057404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ranran Li, Chen Chen, Lin Shang, Ying Bai, Duo Chen, Xiangdong Kong, Qianqian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Genomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersXinxiang Medical UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Hainan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHuman geneticsGeneticsAtaxiaBiologyMedicineGeneNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a rare early-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, spasticity, and sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. This disorder is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the sacsin (SACS) gene on chromosome 13q12.12. Three patients with ARSACS from two unrelated Chinese families were recruited for this study. Patient #1 was an 18-year-old male who had been walking unstably for 12 years. Patient #2, the younger sister of Patient #1, was a 5-year-old girl who had been walking unstably for 2 years. Patient #3 was a 19-year-old female who had been walking unstably and a tendency to fall for 17 years. For Patient #1, whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified a hemizygous variant c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in SACS (NM_014363.6), with the father being heterozygous, the mother wild-type, and Patient #2 hemizygous, as verified by Sanger sequencing. Additional copy number variant analysis of the WES data indicated that Patient #1 had a heterozygous gross deletion of chr13q12.12 (chr13:23,808,732 - 24,890,322). Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing results revealed that Patient #2 carried a chr13q12.12 deletion (chr13:23,520,000-24,940,000). Together with Sanger sequencing results, this gross deletion was speculated to have been inherited from the mother, further explaining the hemizygous state of c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in Patients #1 and #2. Through WES, Patient #3 was identified as having suspected compound heterozygous variants of c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*), inherited from the father and mother, respectively, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing. This study identified three variants in SACS. The c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) is novel, whereas c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*) have been reported previously. Moreover, this study highlights the growing trend that ARSACS has become increasingly prevalent worldwide rather than being localized to a specific region or race. As an increasing number of patients with ARSACS are diagnosed, the genetic spectrum of ARSACS will gradually broaden, providing an accurate genetic basis for prenatal diagnosis of mothers in the years ahead, if possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical GenomicsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207