Highly selective and stable Cu-based dual-function materials for integrated CO2 capture and in-situ conversion to CO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrating carbon capture and conversion by reverse water–gas shift reaction (ICCC-RWGS) represents an innovative and promising CO 2 mitigation and valorization strategy. Nevertheless, developing efficient and stable dual-function materials (DFMs) offering both high CO 2 conversion and CO selectivity remains very challenging. Herein, we developed a new series of highly selective DFMs (Cu/Na-CaO/γ-Al 2 O 3 , denoted as Cu X NaCa Y Al Z ; where NaCa and Al represent Na-CaO and γ-Al 2 O 3 , respectively) tailored for the ICCC-RWGS process and evaluated their performance in different conditions. The findings highlight the substantial impact of Cu content on DFM performance by modulating its physiochemical properties. All DFMs exhibited a 100 % CO selectivity, regardless of temperature. Despite a slight decrease in CO 2 uptake and conversion in the presence of oxygen compared to ideal conditions, Cu 10 NaCa 30 Al 60 demonstrated remarkable stability with no decline in CO 2 conversion over 12 cycles. While CO 2 capture capacity improved with increasing temperatures up to 650 °C, the slower decarbonation rate at lower temperatures created a more favorable equilibrium between decarbonation and RWGS rates, leading to higher conversion. Subsequently, a non-isothermal ICCC-RWGS was proposed, with CO 2 capture at 650 °C and hydrogenation at 610 °C. Cu 10 NaCa 80 Al 10 exhibited remarkable stability over 18 cycles, showing an increasing CO 2 capture and CO formation trend, peaking at the 14th cycle before stabilizing, while maintaining a consistently high CO 2 conversion of approximately 91 %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".