MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410067600 · doi:10.1002/hyp.70134

Impacts of Drought on Water Fluxes and Water‐Use Efficiency in an Age‐Sequence of Temperate Conifer Forests

2025· article· en· W4410067600 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Elizabeth Arango Ruda, M. Altaf Arain

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersGlobal Water FuturesMinistry of EnvironmentOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityOntario Innovation TrustOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestrySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsTemperate climateEnvironmental scienceTemperate rainforestSequence (biology)Temperate forestHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyEcologyGeographyGeologyEcosystemBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Evapotranspiration (ET) from temperate forests plays a significant role in the regional and global water cycles. However, extreme weather events such as heat and drought are affecting the water use and water use efficiency (WUE) of these forests. Climate change impacts may be more severe in plantation forests where the age of the forest plays a significant role, causing differences in their responses to environmental stresses. This study presents 14 years (2008–2021) of water flux data measured using the eddy covariance technique in an age sequence (83, 48 and 20 years as of 2021) of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) forests in the Great Lakes region in southern Ontario, Canada. The mean annual ET was 465 ± 41, 466 ± 32 and 403 ± 21 mm year−1 in the 83‐, 48‐ and 20‐year‐old stands, respectively, with the highest annual water flux observed in the 83‐year‐ old stand, which was similar to that of the 48‐year‐old stand. Mean annual gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) was 1585 ± 100, 1660 ± 115 and 1634 ± 331 g C m−2 year−1in the 83‐, 48‐ and 20‐year‐old stands, respectively, while mean annual WUE was 3.4 ± 0.4, 3.6 ± 0.4 and 4.0 ± 0.8 g C kg H2O year−1 in the respective stands. Lower ET and relatively higher GEP resulted in the highest WUE in the youngest stand, even though the highest GEP was observed in the middle‐aged stand. Air temperature (Tair) was the dominant control on ET, GEP and WUE in all three different‐aged stands, while drought, characterised as the relative extractable water (REW) in the soil, had a significant impact on ET in the late summer. The results of this study further showed that forest age significantly influenced how forests responded to drought stresses. The younger stand was more efficient in carbon sequestration and water use despite exhibiting greater sensitivity to water stress and higher drought coupling. The long‐term eddy covariance measurements analysed in this study have helped to enhance our understanding of water exchange processes in the temperate conifer forest ecosystems in Eastern North America. Specifically, this work contributes to a better understanding of how different‐aged forests respond to extreme weather events, aiding in the development of new strategies for managing water resources and ensuring water security in the region under a changing climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207