MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410068210 · doi:10.3390/ijms26094364

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) to Promote Cancer Progression

2025· review· en· W4410068210 on OpenAlexafffund
Saima Ghafoor, Elizabeth Garcia, Sujata Persad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionTranscription factorReprogrammingCell biologySignal transductionBiologySlugTwist transcription factorMesenchymal stem cellCancer researchCancerMetastasisCellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is crucial in various physiological/pathological circumstances such as development, wound healing, stem cell behavior, and cancer progression. It involves the conversion of epithelial cells into a mesenchymal phenotype, which causes the cells to become highly motile. This reprogramming is initiated and controlled by various signaling pathways and governed by several key transcription factors, including Snail 1, Snail 2 (Slug), TWIST 1, TWIST2, ZEB1, ZEB2, PRRX1, GOOSECOID, E47, FOXC2, SOX4, SOX9, HAND1, and HAND2. The intracellular signaling pathways are activated/inactivated by signals received from the extracellular environment and the transcription factors are carefully regulated at the transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels to maintain tight regulatory control of EMT. One of the most important pathways involved in this process is the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) family signaling pathway. This review will discuss the role of EMT in promoting epithelial cancer progression and the convergence/interplay of multiple signaling pathways and transcription factors that regulate this phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207