MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410069768 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf721

Physical properties and gas kinematics of massive star forming region G328.24−0.55

2025· article· en· W4410069768 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C J Ugwu, James O. Chibueze

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesUniversity of South AfricaMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyNational Science Foundation, United Arab EmiratesNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Research FoundationNational Science FoundationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionKorea Astronomy and Space Science Institute
KeywordsPhysicsKinematicsAstrophysicsStar (game theory)AstronomyForming gasClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study presents the results of Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) band 6 archival data of G328.24–0.55, with the aim to pin down the physical and kinematic properties of young stellar objects in G328.24–0.55 star forming region. The dust continuum image reveals five protostellar objects (MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2, and MM3), with MM1a dominating the region. The dust continuum peaks do not coincide with the strongest radio continuum peak previously detected in the region in a MeerKAT observation, but coincide with the weaker MeerKAT peak. The dust continuum objects are associated with faint unresolved infrared emission. We detected 70, 49, 26, 7, and 8 molecular transitions toward MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2 and MM3, respectively. This variation in the number of detected molecular transitions supports different excitation conditions in these objects. The excitation temperatures estimated toward MM1a, MM1b, and MM1c are $\sim$183, 168, and 110 K, respectively. MM2 and MM3 lack multiple transitions of molecular lines to determine their excitation temperatures. The masses of MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2, and MM3 were calculated to be 23.2, 16.1, 12.0, 9.8, and 14.9 ${\rm M}_{\odot }$, respectively. The velocity gradient of CH$_{3}$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) emission traces a rotating structure, probably an envelope of gas around MM1a. Bipolar outflow traced by CO emission is seen towards MM1a. The properties of MM1a clearly point to the existence of a massive protostellar object that is still undergoing accretion and outflow in its early formative stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→