MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410077357 · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01613-2

Artificial intelligence guided imaging as a tool to fill gaps in health care delivery

2025· editorial· en· W4410077357 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Li, Elizabeth J. Enichen, Kimia Heydari, Joseph C. Kvedar

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Digital Medicine · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth care deliveryHealth careMedical imagingMedical physicsPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineArtificial intelligencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) causes significant morbidity/mortality and timely diagnosis often via ultrasound is critical. However, the shortage of trained ultrasound providers has been an ongoing challenge. Recently, Speranza and colleagues (2025) demonstrated that an artificial intelligence (AI) guided ultrasound system used by non-ultrasound-trained nurses with remote clinician review can achieve sensitivities of 90–98% and specificities of 74–100% for diagnosing DVT. This study highlights the potential for AI guided imaging to address important gaps in health care delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Digital MedicineSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207