MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410085322 · doi:10.1162/imag.a.12

Charting the path in rodent functional neuroimaging

2025· article· en· W4410085322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringStanford Maternal and Child Health Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsNeuroimagingRodentRodent modelPath (computing)PsychologyNeuroscienceComputer scienceBiologyMedicineEcologyInternal medicineComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by a period of accelerated progress and recent technical breakthroughs, whole-brain functional neuroimaging in rodents offers exciting new possibilities for addressing basic questions about brain function and its alterations. In response to lessons learned from the human neuroimaging community, leading scientists and researchers in the field convened to address existing barriers and outline ambitious goals for the future. This article captures these discussions, highlighting a shared vision to advance rodent functional neuroimaging into an era of increased impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it