MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410086449 · doi:10.1109/tap.2025.3565007

A Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface With Surface-Wave Assisted Beamforming Capabilities

2025· article· en· W4410086449 on OpenAlexaff
Vasileios G. Ataloglou, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingSurface (topology)Surface waveComputer scienceReconfigurable antennaAcousticsElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsDipole antennaAntenna (radio)PhysicsEngineeringMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of tunability mechanisms in the metasurface design has unleashed a tremendous potential for wireless communications. In particular, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) can manipulate the reflections of an incident electromagnetic wave at will, based on the real-time conditions, with the aim of enhancing communication links. In this paper, we develop an RIS at C band that operates with a transverse-electric (TE) polarization and can shape the radiation pattern at a single plane with high-accuracy, in addition to the more conventional beamsteering functionalities. The beamforming is facilitated by subwavelength unit cells that allow the excitation of auxiliary surface waves in the vicinity of the RIS. Importantly, these evanescent fields are predicted and harnessed through an integral-equation framework used for the analysis and optimization of the RIS. A fabricated prototype demonstrates beamsteering up to ±60° with an average illumination efficiency of 95% and sector patterns with a varying beamwidth (ranging from 30° to 60°) that verify the full-wave simulations. Lastly, losses are predicted and constrained during the optimization stage leading to solutions with relatively high power efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207