Optimized Metamaterials for Design of Enhanced-Performance High Order Mode Dipole-Driven Yagi-Uda Antenna for Millimeter Wave Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a Yagi antenna optimized for third-order mode operation within the millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum. A third-order mode driven dipole, along with a reflector, is introduced to enhance the antenna’s gain. The rigorous numerical optimization procedure was employed to precisely adjust the dimensions and positions of the driven dipole, director, and reflectors. The optimized Yagi antenna operates within the fifth generation (5G) band at 28 GHz, with a bandwidth of 2.6 GHz. Radiation pattern analysis indicates that the gain of the antenna in this higher resonant mode exceeds that of a conventional Yagi-Uda antenna, achieving a gain of 9.35 dBi at 28 GHz. To further increase the gain and address the path loss challenges in the mmWave spectrum, a near-zero index metamaterial (NZIM) array was integrated. A 5×5 unit cell array was embedded into the same antenna substrate, positioned in front of the reflector. The metamaterial array was optimized using the trust-region (TR) algorithm, resulting in a significant gain enhancement, reaching 13.8 dBi at 28 GHz while maintaining the operational bandwidth in terms of impedance matching. The antenna was subsequently fabricated and tested, with experimental results demonstrating a strong correlation with the simulated outcomes across all key parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".