MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410087689 · doi:10.33137/rr.v47i4.45369

Competing Hermeneutics: The Martyr Murals at Santo Stefano Rotondo

2025· article· en· W4410087689 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Louis Groarke

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMartyrHermeneuticsArtArt historyPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frescoed martyrdom murals at Santo Stefano Rotondo in Rome (c. 1582) have inspired much conflicting commentary down through the centuries. Painted by Niccolò Circignani (familiarly known as il Pomarancio), they feature gruesome, realistic renderings of torture scenes dating from the late Roman persecutions. Protestant and Catholic audiences have offered dramatically opposing evaluations of the harrowing subject matter on display. In this article, I report on and analyze the paintings from both a Protestant and a Catholic point of view. I want to show how a careful historical analysis can recover intentionality—the original purpose and aspirations embodied in an artwork—and, at the same time, make sense of incompatible readings of the very same visual content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207