MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410087724 · doi:10.33137/rr.v47i4.45368

Francesco Salviati and the Horses of San Marco

2025· article· en· W4410087724 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sharon Gregory

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1539, Florence’s newly elected Duke Cosimo I de’ Medici began to turn the Palazzo della Signoria into his ducal residence. The first major artistic work he commissioned for the palazzo was a cycle of frescoes by Francesco Salviati (1543–48), with scenes from the life of Marcus Furius Camillus. Salviati’s Triumph of Furius Camillus fresco is discussed in light of a preparatory drawing, which shows a chariot drawn by an animated group of horses very like the famous horses of San Marco in Venice (where Salviati had worked from 1539 until 1541), and very unlike the regimented group that draws the chariot in the final fresco. In the wake of Savonarolan reforms to the Florentine government after the expulsion of the Medici, the Venetian quadriga cannot have been politically acceptable to Duke Cosimo. Salviati presumably altered his design to better accord with Cosimo’s self-association with imperial Rome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207