Study on Reducing the Order of Mathematical Model for Combustion Instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a low-dimensional thermoacoustic model for predicting pressure fluctuations in lean-burn combustion systems.Traditional monitoring approaches based solely on experimental data or physical models lack accuracy and responsiveness for real-time applications.To address this limitation, a linearized acoustic wave equation incorporating heat release fluctuations and flowinduced acoustic sources was formulated using conservation laws.A finite element Analysis (FEA) model was developed and implemented in the time domain via the Newmark- scheme.A simplified Rijke tube model was constructed, with input data such as temperature distribution derived from high-speed flame image analysis, enabling computational efficiency and nearreal-time prediction without CFD.Experimental validation was conducted with a premixed combustor under various air flow rates and burner positions.The predicted and observed pressure signals showed increasing amplitude with leaner mixtures.The correlation coefficients for the peak frequencies of the first and second modes were 0.77 and 0.67, respectively.Damping ratios estimated using Hilbert transform and curve fitting yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.73.The most unstable flame location corresponded to the position of maximum acoustic pressure gradient, consistent with the theoretical forcing term formulation.These results demonstrate the model's capability to capture combustion instability trends and its potential for future integration with data assimilation and machine learning techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".