Pengaruh Personal selling, Kualitas Produk Dan Harga Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia Di Blitar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa pengaruh personal selling, kualitas produki dan harga terhadap keputusan pembelian produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah pelanggan CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar berjumlah 58 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner, sedangkan teknik analisa data menggunakan regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian membuktian bahwa personal selling dan kualitas produk berpengaruh secara parsial dan simultan terhadap keputusan pembelian produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar. Secara parsial harga tidak berpengaruh terhadap keputusan pembelian produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar, tetapi secara simultan harga berpengaruh keputusan pembelian produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar. Di antara ketiga variabel tersebut, kualitas produk memiliki pengaruh dominan terhadap keputusan pembelian produk CV. Sinar Mentari Indonesia di Blitar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it