MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410092651 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.174407

Altermagnetic instabilities from quantum geometry

2025· article· en· W4410092651 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Niclas Heinsdorf

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGeometryPhysicsQuantumClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Altermagnets are a newly identified type of collinear antiferromagnetism with vanishing net magnetic moment, characterized by lifted Kramers' degeneracy in parts of the Brillouin zone. Their time-reversal symmetry-broken band structure has been observed experimentally and is theoretically well understood. On the contrary, altermagnetic fluctuations and the formation of the corresponding instabilities remains largely unexplored. We establish a correspondence between the quantum metric of normal and the altermagnetic spin-splitting of ordered phases. We analytically derive a criterion for the formation of instabilities and show that the quantum metric favors altermagnetism. We recover the expression for conventional <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>q</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> instabilities where the spin-splitting terms of the normal-state model are locally absent. As an example, we construct an effective model of MnTe and illustrate the relationship between quantum geometry and altermagnetic fluctuations by explicitly computing the quantum metric and the generalized magnetic susceptibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207