MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410098741 · doi:10.1080/08957959.2025.2498496

Brillouinview for Brillouin spectroscopy data processing and single crystal elasticity modelling

2025· article· en· W4410098741 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Meryem Berrada, T. M. Hayes, Juliana Peckenpaugh, Alan McFall, Ian Wynn, Bin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Pressure Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Coordination OfficeNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsBrillouin SpectroscopyElasticity (physics)SpectroscopyMaterials scienceSingle crystalBrillouin scatteringBiological systemCrystallographyOpticsChemistryPhysicsComposite materialLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Brillouin scattering technique is crucial in geosciences and material sciences because it allows for the accurate determination of elastic properties of materials, which are essential for understanding their behavior and stability under various conditions. BrillouinView is an open-source software program developed in Python, designed to seamlessly integrate the calibration, visualization, and fitting of Brillouin scattering data with single-crystal elasticity modeling. Despite its importance in geosciences and materials sciences, the Brillouin scattering technique has historically lacked feature-rich, functional analysis and modeling software due to its complexity and the need for precise calibration and fitting techniques. BrillouinView addresses these challenges by providing a comprehensive toolkit that simplifies and enhances the analysis process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigh Pressure ResearchSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207