MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410099644 · doi:10.3390/s25092912

Decoding Poultry Welfare from Sound—A Machine Learning Framework for Non-Invasive Acoustic Monitoring

2025· article· en· W4410099644 on OpenAlexafffund
V. M. Manikandan, Suresh Neethirajan

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMitacsEgg Farmers of Canada
KeywordsRandom forestMel-frequency cepstrumComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Feature (linguistics)Machine learningGeneralizability theorySpeech recognitionFeature extractionStatisticsMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic monitoring presents a promising, non-invasive modality for assessing animal welfare in precision livestock farming. In poultry, vocalizations encode biologically relevant cues linked to health status, behavioral states, and environmental stress. This study proposes an integrated analytical framework that combines signal-level statistical analysis with machine learning and deep learning classifiers to interpret chicken vocalizations in a welfare assessment context. The framework was evaluated using three complementary datasets encompassing health-related vocalizations, behavioral call types, and stress-induced acoustic responses. The pipeline employs a multistage process comprising high-fidelity signal acquisition, feature extraction (e.g., mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, spectral contrast, zero-crossing rate), and classification using models including Random Forest, HistGradientBoosting, CatBoost, TabNet, and LSTM. Feature importance analysis and statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, correlation metrics) confirmed that specific MFCC bands and spectral descriptors were significantly associated with welfare indicators. LSTM-based temporal modeling revealed distinct acoustic trajectories under visual and auditory stress, supporting the presence of habituation and stressor-specific vocal adaptations over time. Model performance, validated through stratified cross-validation and multiple statistical metrics (e.g., F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient), demonstrated high classification accuracy and generalizability. Importantly, the approach emphasizes model interpretability, facilitating alignment with known physiological and behavioral processes in poultry. The findings underscore the potential of acoustic sensing and interpretable AI as scalable, biologically grounded tools for real-time poultry welfare monitoring, contributing to the advancement of sustainable and ethical livestock production systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207