MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Свето-индуцированная скачкообразная гидродинамическая инверсия направления молекулярной ориентации в жидких кристаллах

2025· article· ru· W4410104350 on OpenAlexaff
В. С. Акобян, Tigran Galstian, Р. С. Акопян

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of NAS RA Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Численно решена задача о лазерно-индуцированной гидродинамической переориентации (ЛИГП) директора гибридно-ориентированного нематического жидкого кристалла (НЖК) с прозвольными граничными условиями. ЛИГП изучена при различных мощностях лазера и для двух противоположных направлений градиента температуры. Градиент скорости гидродинамического потока приводит к небольшому увеличению кривизны гибридной ориентации, когда свет создает градиент температуры вовне кривизны. Кривизна меняет знак, когда свет создает градиент температуры снаружи вовнутрь кривизны гибридной ориентации. Исследована также зависимость переориентации от энергии крепления молекул к границам. The problem of laser-induced hydrodynamic reorientation (LIHR) of the director of a hybrid-oriented nematic liquid crystal (NLC) with arbitrary boundary conditions has been numerically solved. LIHR is studied at different laser powers and for two opposite directions of the temperature gradients. The hydrodynamic flow velocity gradient leads to a small increase in curvature when light creates temperature gradient in the out-of-curvature side of the hybrid orientation. The curvature changes sign when light creates temperature gradient from outside to inside the curvature of the hybrid orientation. The dependence of reorientation on the anchoring energy of molecules to the boundaries is also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of NAS RA PhysicsSame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207