MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410109226 · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2025.102352

Conservation and divergence of the molecular regulators of the vertebrate fertilization synapse

2025· review· en· W4410109226 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andreas Blaha, Alexander Schleiffer, Andrea Pauli

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBoehringer Ingelheim StiftungÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftCANDU Owners GroupResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology
KeywordsBiologyVertebrateDivergence (linguistics)Evolutionary biologyHuman fertilizationSynapseComputational biologyGeneticsNeuroscienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fertilization - the process during which sperm and egg find each other, bind and eventually fuse - marks the beginning of a new individual. Research over the past years in vertebrates has shed new light on conserved and divergent molecular regulators that mediate the formation of the fertilization synapse, the close apposition of the two plasma membranes before fusion. Here, we review the known proteins that are required for sperm-egg interaction in mammals and fish from a phylogenetic perspective. While some sperm factors are only conserved in vertebrates and share phylogenetic and structural features, others have a longer evolutionary history. In contrast, the egg factors have changed even within vertebrates despite recognizing the preserved sperm machinery. Future functional work on these factors will be essential to understand the fusion mechanism of vertebrate sperm and egg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Genetics & DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207