MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410109609 · doi:10.18865/ethndis-2024-17

Mental Health and Cognitive Performance Among Older People Living with HIV in Georgia

2025· article· en· W4410109609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Esma Imerlishvili, Deborah Gustafson, Davit Baliashvili, Ana Karaulashvili, Jack DeHovitz, Mamuka Djibuti

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnicity & Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Mental healthGerontologyCognitionOlder peoplePsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyPsychiatryFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Highly effective antiretroviral therapy has increased the life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWH), resulting in an increase in noncommunicable diseases, including cognitive and mental health disorders. Published literature on cognitive performance in older PLWH is scarce in low- and middle-income countries, including Georgia. Our study aimed to assess mental health and cognitive performance and identify associated factors among PLWH aged ≥40 years. Methods: Primary mental health and behavior assessments included the Drug Use Disorder Identification Test, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). Cognitive assessments included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Trail Making Tests A and B; verbal fluency; Stroop 1, 2, and 3; and Grooved Pegboard. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with cognitive performance. Results: Our sample included 125 PLWH (78 men, 47 women). Drug use-related problems or drug dependence was observed in 36% and hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption among 23%. Mild to extreme depressive symptoms were observed among 51% and mild to severe anxiety among 47%. A MoCA score <26 was observed among 89%. Multivariable regression analyses showed higher mean scores on the Stroop Test 3 associated with higher scores on the GAD-7 (β=.40; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68) and BDI (β=.70; 95% CI, 0.17-1.2). No other associations were observed. Conclusion: This study shows high percentages of psychiatric and cognitive morbidities among older PLWH in Georgia. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to evaluate cognitive performance and associated factors among older PLWH in Georgia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnicity & DiseaseSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207