MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410111145 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115670

Somatostatin interneurons select dorsomedial striatal representations of the initial motor learning phase

2025· article· en· W4410111145 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sanziana Rotariu, Gisela Zalcman, Nagham Badreddine, Florence Appaix, Stefania Sarno, Ingrid Bureau, Élodie Fino

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheInMed Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsNeuroscienceSomatostatinMotor learningPsychologyStriatumBiologyDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dorsomedial striatum (DMS) is an associative node involved in the initial formation of motor sequences and the adaptation of ongoing actions. During early associative or motor learning tasks, DMS shows a global reduction of activity, eventually refining a subset of active neurons whose number correlates with animal performance. Understanding how this representation emerges is crucial to deciphering the plasticity mechanisms underlying early phases of learning. Here, we propose that local inhibitory interneurons shape early DMS representation and influence task performance. We report that the selective manipulation of somatostatin (SOM)-positive interneurons disrupts DMS activity reorganization and modulates early-learning performance. This effect is cell specific, as manipulation of parvalbumin-positive interneurons has no effect. We also identify the high plasticity of SOM-mediated feedforward inhibition as a critical modulator of striatal projection neuron firing activity. Hence, SOM interneurons are key DMS circuit organizers and set the pace of early learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207