MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410113123 · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004713

Relationship between time-varying achieved HbA<sub>1c</sub> and risk of coronary artery disease events among common haptoglobin phenotype groups with type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE study

2025· article· en· W4410113123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthResearch Nova Scotia
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHaptoglobinType 2 diabetesCoronary artery diseaseGlycated hemoglobinDiabetes mellitusGastroenterologyHazard ratioCohortCohort studyEndocrinologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction This study sought to determine whether the association between attaining specific glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) targets (&lt;7.0% (&lt;53 mmol/mol) and ≥8.0% (≥64 mmol/mol) compared with 7.0%–7.9%) over time and risk of incident coronary artery disease (CAD) was dependent on haptoglobin (Hp) phenotype in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study. Research design and methods Prospectively collected HbA 1c data from the ADVANCE biomarker case-cohort study, updated at 6 months and every 12 months thereafter over a median of 5.0 (IQR 4.5–5.3) years, were analyzed in relation to incident CAD in the Hp2-2 (n=1323) and non-Hp2-2 (n=2069) phenotypes separately using weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Additional a priori stratifications by sex, race, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), and type 2 diabetes duration were performed. Results Mean HbA 1c was similar in each phenotype group throughout the study. Compared with HbA 1c of 7.0%–7.9%, HbA 1c &lt;7.0% was not associated with CAD risk for any phenotype group or subgroup. HbA 1c ≥8.0% compared with 7.0%–7.9% over time was associated with higher CAD risk for the Hp2-2 phenotype only (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.32; no significant association in the non-Hp2-2 type: 1.26, 0.89 to 1.77, p-interaction=0.71); this was pronounced when those with previous CVD at baseline were excluded (Hp2-2: 2.80, 1.41 to 5.53, p-interaction=0.03). Compared with HbA 1c of &lt;8.0%, having HbA 1c ≥8.0% was associated with a 59% higher CAD risk among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (1.59, 1.12 to 2.26) and a 39% higher CAD risk among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype (1.39, 1.03 to 1.88, p-interaction=0.97). Conclusions The present ADVANCE analysis suggests that not having HbA 1c ≥8.0%, rather than achieving HbA 1c &lt;7.0%, was found to be particularly important for CAD prevention among people with type 2 diabetes and the common Hp2-2 phenotype. While the subgroup analyses were likely underpowered, their inclusion is hypothesis generating and can be used in future meta-analyses to improve power and generalizability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it