Physically-Consistent Multi-Band Massive MIMO Systems: A Radio Resource Management Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) antenna systems and inter-band carrier aggregation (CA)-enabled multi-band communication are two key technologies to achieve very high data rates in beyond fifth generation (B5G) wireless systems. We propose a joint optimization framework for such systems where the mMIMO antenna spacing selection, pre-coder optimization, optimum subcarrier selection and optimum power allocation are carried out simultaneously. We harness the bandwidth gain existing in a tightly coupled base station mMIMO antenna system to avoid sophisticated, non-practical antenna systems for multi-band operation. In particular, we analyze a multi-band communication system using a circuit-theoretic model to consider physical characteristics of a tightly coupled antenna array, and formulate a joint optimization problem to maximize the sum-rate. As part of the optimization, we also propose a novel block iterative water-filling-based subcarrier selection and power allocation optimization algorithm for the multi-band mMIMO system. A novel subcarrier windowing-based subcarrier selection scheme is also proposed which considers the physical constraints (hardware limitation) at the mobile user devices. We carry out the optimizations in two ways: (i) to optimize the antenna spacing selection in an offline manner, and (ii) to select antenna elements from a dense array dynamically. Via computer simulations, we illustrate superior bandwidth gains present in the tightly-coupled colinear and rectangular planar antenna arrays, compared to the loosely-coupled or tightly-coupled parallel arrays. We compare the optimum sum-rate performance of the proposed optimizationbased framework under various power allocation schemes and various user capability scenarios. Also, we show that the proposed optimization framework is superior to the existing joint optimization frameworks in terms of sum-rate performance and we verify the convergence of the proposed iterative optimization algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".