Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte propose un survol de la question complexe du chant en langue vernaculaire dans la liturgie de la messe et de l’office divin dans les missions canadiennes sous le Régime français, en évoquant quelques-uns de ses fondements historiques, en précisant sa nature et en décrivant sa fonction au sein du projet colonial. Influencés par le renouveau liturgique du concile de Trente et la mouvance réformiste gallicane, les missionnaires français arrivant dans la vallée du Saint-Laurent au xviie siècle durent composer avec des populations amérindiennes attachées à leurs langues et coutumes. Afin de faciliter leur conversion, ils créèrent une sorte de plain-chant hybride traduit dans les différentes langues amérindiennes qui fut progressivement adopté par les autochtones. Ce faisant, les jésuites et prêtres séculiers impliqués dans la Mission canadienne proposèrent une solution originale à l’épineuse question du respect des formes tridentines de la liturgie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".