MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410117886 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554096

PDRs4All

2025· article· en· W4410117886 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Baria Khan, B. P. Abbott, E. Peeters, G.M. Alexander Tielens, Takashi Onaka, J. Cami, Bethany Schefter, Christiaan Boersma, E. Dartois, J. R. Goicoechea, Alexandros Maragkoudakis, Dries Van De Putte, Mridusmita Buragohain, Alessandra Candian, Á. Labiano, Thomas S. -Y. Lai, Alessandra Ricca, Yong Zhang, Ameek Sidhu, Ryan Chown, Amélie Canin, Boris Trahin, Ilane Schroetter, Olga Kannavou, Felipe Alarcón, Olivier Berné, E. Habart

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsBar (unit)AstronomyBendingMoleculePlane (geometry)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. The infrared universe is dominated by emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) observed as aromatic infrared bands (AIBs). JWST has produced a rich trove of information on these PAH signatures. Aims. We aim to investigate the photochemical evolution of PAHs in photodissociation regions (PDRs), focusing on their molecular edge structures across key zones, including the H II region, the ionization front, the atomic PDR, the dissociation front, and the molecular PDR. Methods. We utilized JWST’s MIRI-MRS observations of the Orion Bar for the PDRs4All JWST Early Release Science program. We investigated the spectral and spatial characteristics of 10–15 µm AIBs. Results. The AIBs at 10.6, 10.8, 11.0, 11.2, 12.0, 12.7, 13.5, 14.0, and 14.2 µm share large-scale spatial morphologies, peaking in the atomic PDR and gradually declining with distance from the PDR surface. Correlations between the AIBs reveal that they are largely carried by PAHs. Profile variations and subcomponents of the 11.2 and 12.0 µm AIBs reveal a carrier that behaves independently of PAHs, which we attribute to very small grains (VSGs) and/or PAH clusters. We ascribe the 11.0 and 11.207 µm AIBs, part of the 12.0 µm AIB, and the 12.7, 13.5, and 14.2 µm AIBs to CHoop modes and discuss their hydrogen-adjacency assignments. We propose that the 10.6, 10.8, and 14.0 µm AIBs do not arise from CHoop modes. We derived the relative amounts of solo, duo, trio, and quartet CH groups to infer the molecular structures. These suggest that PAHs are dominated by solo and trio CH groups throughout the PDR. We attribute the decrease in duo and quartet CH groups relative to the solo CH groups toward the PDR surface to the effects of photolysis of the labile hydrogens. Conclusions. The 10–15 µm AIBs are powerful probes of the PAH molecular structures. This study showcases the spatial and spectral variability in CHoop features due to photochemical processing of PAHs, and the differentiated spectral characteristics of PAHs and VSGs, in a prototypical PDR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→