Evidence for Pituitary Repression of the Human Growth Hormone-Related Placental Lactogen Genes and a Role for P Sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human (h) growth hormone (GH)/placental lactogen (PL) gene family has served as an important model to study tissue-specific expression. The two GH genes (hGH-N/GH1 and GH-V/GH2) and three PL or chorionic somatomammotropin hormone (CSH) genes (hPL-L/CSL1, hPL-A/CSH1 and hPL-B/CSH2) are clustered together at a single locus. Although they share >90% sequence similarity, hGH-N is expressed by somatotrophs of the anterior pituitary while the remaining four hGH/PL genes are expressed by the villous syncytiotrophoblast of the placenta. Efficient pituitary expression depends on a locus control region (LCR) that includes nuclease hypersensitive sites I-V (HS I-V). For activation, data indicate that HS III facilitates the initial access of pituitary-specific transcription factor Pit-1 to the locus, where it is required to bind Pit-1 sites at HS I/II and the hGH-N promoter. This is associated with histone acetylation and tri-methylation modifications that are consistent with active chromatin. However, all five hGH/PL genes share similar nuclease sensitivity in human pituitary chromatin, suggesting similar levels of accessibility and thus potential for transcription. Furthermore, hPL-A and hPL-B promoters contain Pit-1 binding sites, and the hPL-A promoter, like hGH-N, will support expression in transfected pituitary tumor GC cells in culture. These observations suggest the possibility of a transcriptional repressor mechanism that prevents hPL gene expression in the pituitary. P sequences were identified as a candidate. They are located upstream of all four placental hGH/PL genes but not hGH-N, repress hPL-A promoter activity in transfected pituitary GC cells, and bind a forkhead box A1/nuclear factor-1 transcription, which is proposed to act as a repressor complex in human pituitary chromatin. In spite of this, the inability to limit hGH-N expression when tested in transgenic mice brought the role of P sequences in pituitary repression into question. These observations are re-examined here in light of new evidence that the LCR (HS III) interacts with P sequences in the human pituitary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".