MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410120037 · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00408.2024

Contribution of neuroligin and neurexin alternative splicing to the establishment of enteric neuronal synaptic specificity

2025· article· en· W4410120037 on OpenAlexaff
Fabien D’Autréaux, Alcmène Chalazonitis, Timothy Gershon, Michael D. Gershon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsNeurexinNeuroliginSynaptogenesisBiologyPostsynaptic potentialEnteric nervous systemCell adhesion moleculeNeuroscienceCell biologyNeurotransmitterSynapseCentral nervous systemReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We found that neuroligins and neurexins play roles in establishing ENS synapses. Both are extensively spliced in the fetal and adult gut. When expressed in non-neuronal cells, both neuroligins and neurexins are sufficient to recruit, respectively, presynaptic and postsynaptic elements. Soluble neurexin inhibits enteric synapse formation and recruitment of neurotransmitter receptors by interfering with endogenous neurexin/neuroligin binding. The neurexin/neuroligin splice code contributes physiologically to ENS synaptic specificity, promoting for example, cholinergic or serotonergic synaptogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver PhysiologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207