MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410122363 · doi:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18271

Perforation of the Interventricular Septum by a Temporary Transvenous Pacing Lead Detected by Cardiac Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

2025· article· en· W4410122363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pablo Blanco, Liliana Figueroa

Bibliographic record

VenuePOCUS Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLead (geology)Atrioventricular blockInterventricular septumPoint of care ultrasoundPerforationCardiologyCardiac UltrasoundCardiac pacingInternal medicineUltrasoundSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several complications can arise during or shortly after the placement of a temporary transvenous pacemaker (TTP), some of which can be potentially devastating. A TTP was successfully placed under the guidance of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) and intracavitary electrocardiogram (ECG) in a middle-aged woman with symptomatic complete atrioventricular block. Three days post-insertion, pacemaker malfunction was observed along with the migration of the pacing lead to the left ventricular apex on cardiac POCUS. The lead was promptly repositioned, and no complications were noted on subsequent cardiac POCUS examinations. To prevent complications and aid early detection of complications associated with TTPs, cardiac POCUS should be strongly considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePOCUS JournalSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207