MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410122654 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-jgr1s

Photoinduced Cleavage of Alkenyl Fluorides for Nucleophilic Acyl Substitution via In Situ Generated Acyl Fluorides

2025· preprint· en· W4410122654 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emma Gogarnoiu, Ajay H. Bansode, Joshua Paolillo, Joseph Bergen, Marvin Parasram

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthYork UniversityNational Institute of General Medical SciencesDeciphera Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsNucleophilic substitutionCleavage (geology)ChemistryIn situSubstitution reactionNucleophileMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acyl fluorides are versatile intermediates desired for their stability and unique reactivity with amines and other nucleophiles, enabling targeted nucleophilic acyl substitution reactions. Despite their utility, practical methods for their synthesis remain limited. Herein, we describe a facile, one-pot protocol to generate acyl fluorides from alkenyl fluorides, the first example of acyl fluoride generation from alkenyl moieties. The transformation is promoted by the visible-light photoexcitation of 4-nitrophthalonitrile, which serves as a photooxidant under anaerobic conditions to cleave the alkenyl fluoride, producing the desired acyl fluoride intermediate along with a carbonyl byproduct. We demonstrate the synthetic utility of this mild and practical approach in the synthesis of linear peptide fragments, highlighting its potential application in chemical biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207