Manajemen perawatan luka pada klien post sectio caesarea di rsud kota bandung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section is a surgical procedure that is often performed to deliver a baby, especially when normal delivery is not possible. Cesarean section delivery is high risk for the mother and fetus, both during labor and the postpartum period, especially the risk of infection in the postoperative wound. Postoperative wound care, especially in patients who undergo caesarean section (CS), is an important aspect of recovery. Purpose: To get an overview of the application of wound management in patients with post-cesarean section. Method: Descriptive method with case study approach. The object of the research is three post sectio caesarea clients at Bandung City Hospital. Data collection used in this case study is interviews, observation and documentation using several research instruments as support in data collection. Results: Good wound healing on the seventh day after standard wound care. Factors that affect wound healing include education, age, and mobilization. One client who was 38 years old (high risk) and had just started mobilizing on the third day, experienced slower healing than the other two patients who had mobilized faster. Conclusion: Proper wound care management and a positive client attitude can accelerate wound healing, reduce pain, and increase mobility. Suggestion: improve the quality of wound care and provide health education to create a positive attitude in patients, which will support the wound healing process. Keywords: Management; Nursing Care; SC (Section Caesarea); Wound. Pendahuluan: Sectio caesarea adalah prosedur bedah yang sering dilakukan untuk melahirkan bayi, terutama ketika persalinan normal tidak memungkinkan. Persalinan sectio caesarea berisiko tinggi bagi ibu dan janin, baik selama persalinan maupun masa nifas, terutama risiko infeksi pada luka pasca operasi. Perawatan luka pasca operasi, khususnya pada pasien yang menjalani sectio caesarea (SC), merupakan aspek penting dalam pemulihan. Tujuan: Untuk mendapatkan gambaran penerapan manajemen luka pada pasien dengan post sectio caesarea. Metode: Metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Objek penelitian tiga orang klien post sectio caesarea di RSUD Kota Bandung. pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam studi kasus ini yaitu wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi dengan menggunakan beberapa instrument penelitian sebagai pendukung dalam pengambilan data. Hasil: Penyembuhan luka yang baik pada hari ketujuh setelah perawatan luka sesuai standar. Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penyembuhan luka antara lain pendidikan, usia, dan mobilisasi. Salah satu klienyang berusia 38 tahun (risiko tinggi) dan baru mulai mobilisasi pada hari ketiga, mengalami penyembuhan lebih lambat dibandingkan dua pasien lainnya yang lebih cepat melakukan mobilisasi. Simpulan: Manajemen perawatan luka yang tepat dan sikap positif klien dapat mempercepat penyembuhan luka, mengurangi nyeri, dan meningkatkan mobilitas. Saran: Meningkatkan kualitas perawatan luka dan memberikan penyuluhan kesehatan untuk menciptakan sikap positif pada pasien, yang akan mendukung proses penyembuhan luka. Kata Kunci: Luka; Manajemen; Perawatan; SC (Sectio Caesarea).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".