MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410125090 · doi:10.7202/1117115ar

Voiles de deuil sur le glacier du Rhône : paysages de désolation et émotions solastalgiques

2025· article· fr· W4410125090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathalie Dietschy

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au glacier du Rhône, en Suisse, comme ailleurs dans les Alpes, des bâches géotextiles sont posées en été sur certaines zones afin de protéger la masse glaciaire et de préserver le tourisme. Plusieurs photographes, parmi lesquels Simon Norfolk et Klaus Thymann, Bernard Garo, Laurence Piaget-Dubuis, Jacques Pugin ou encore Anna Katharina Scheidegger, se sont intéressés à ce nouveau paysage. La série de Norfolk et Thymann, Shroud (2018), réalisée pour l’organisation Project Pressure, vise par exemple à rendre visible la disparition du glacier en montrant un paysage de désolation qui invite au recueillement. Je défends que ces paysages de lamentation, aux accents issus du romantisme, expriment nos rapports ambivalents au vivant, notre exploitation de la montagne jusqu’à sa fin. J’analyse ces projets photographiques en montrant qu’au travers de leurs évocations multiples relevant du deuil et suscitant des émotions solastalgiques, ces photographies témoignent des relations complexes entre photographie, tourisme et glaciers alpins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207