Development of sliding mode observers for estimating sideslip angle and lateral forces in road vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a second-order sliding mode observer (SOSMO) framework developed to improve the estimation of lateral tire forces in vehicles. The framework incorporates two distinct approaches for approximating the sideslip angle: one based on dynamical equations and another employing an inverse model estimation technique with a new tire model. The suggested tire model captures the nonlinear characteristics of tire–road friction, enabling a more accurate representation of lateral force behavior. Comparative evaluations are conducted using a single-track vehicle model based on the Pacejka formula under two scenarios: the open-loop steering pad maneuver and the lane change maneuver. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed methods compared to two established observers, namely, the extended Kalman filter and the state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) filter, even in the absence of detailed tire–road interaction models. Notably, in a steady-state circular driving scenario, the second approach achieves a 99% smaller error compared to the first approach and a 99.38% smaller error relative to the SDRE filter. In a transient maneuver scenario, the second approach achieves a 10.71% smaller error than the first approach and a 99.63% smaller error compared to the SDRE filter. Robust studies under external disturbances further confirm the proposed methods’ precision and reliability in estimating sideslip angle and lateral tire forces, offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional tire–road interaction models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it