Simple Preparation of Sophisticated Multiresponsive Core‐Crystalline Micelles via an Approach Reminiscent of the Division of Labor in Microorganisms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Division of labor, where two identical cells differentiate to carry out distinctive function, represents a major development in evolution. Despite obvious advantages, such behavior remains elusive in supramolecular assembly, due to the difficulty to force a population of identical building blocks to spontaneously split and perform different tasks as they assemble. Here, this differentiation is achieved using a crystallization‐driven self‐assembly approach. A seeded growth on a suspension of aggregated seed crystallites is performed and nanoflower‐like mesostructures with 3D central sections surrounded by rays of 2D petals are prepared. This morphological divergence brings remarkably distinct responses to specific stimuli: high‐temperature annealing induces the formation of hollow petals, while, astonishingly, a simple solvent transfer leads to the perforation of their thick central sections, without affecting their overall morphological integrity. This work demonstrates how an artificial division of labor can be promoted to fabricate highly complex structures via supramolecular self‐assembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it