LEC2 induces somatic cell reprogramming through epigenetic activation of plant cell totipotency regulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many plant species can develop embryos from somatic cells without fertilization. During this process, known as somatic embryogenesis, changes in the DNA methylation patterns are characteristic of reprogramming somatic cells into an embryogenic state. However, the underlying mechanisms connecting DNA methylation and activating totipotency-regulating genes have remained largely unknown. Here, we show that during somatic embryogenesis induced by overexpressing the totipotency-regulating transcription factor LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) in Arabidopsis, CHH hypermethylation is deposited by the LEC2-activated RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway. A reader complex composed of SU(VAR)3-9 HOMOLOGS (SUVH) and its chaperone SUVH-INTERACTING DNAJ DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN (SDJ) binds to the CHH hypermethylated regions and recruits AT-HOOK MOTIF CONTAINING NUCLEAR LOCALIZED (AHL) chromatin modification proteins to increase chromatin accessibility, resulting in the transcriptional activation of totipotency-regulating genes. Our work reveals a molecular framework of how epigenetic modifications mediate somatic cell reprogramming, offering a pathway toward enhancing somatic embryogenesis in agricultural regeneration biology. This study reveals the mechanisms connecting DNA methylation and totipotent gene expression in somatic cell reprogramming. SUVH-SDJ-AHL complex binds to CHH-hypermethylation regions and interacts with LEC2, establishing a feed forward loop to activate totipotency-regulating genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".